Press-Republican

A&E

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
October 28, 2009

'Paranormal Activity' recalls 'Blair Witch' in style

By STEVE OUELLETTE, Movie Review

The most popular movie in America was filmed in a week for less than $15,000?

That's got to be terrifying for the makers of $50-million-and-up horror schlock.

Extreme low-budget flick "Paranormal Activity" turned that rather laudable and shocking box office trick this past weekend, slaying all competition with barely a splatter of blood and a special-effects budget of, well, nil.

It's an impressive feat of marketing, since the film itself is only slightly above average, as far as fright fests go.

"Paranormal Activity" feels a lot like "The Blair Witch Project" did a decade ago. First-time writer-director Oren Peli uses a hand-held camera, unknown actors and scary things that are largely unseen. This time, however, instead of a creepy forest, the action all takes place in a claustrophobic suburban house.

Katie (Katie Featherston) and Micah (Micah Sloat) are a young unmarried couple on opposite ends of the paranormal spectrum. She's a believer, having had brushes with the supernatural from a young age. He's a skeptic who only begins to believe when things start to happen in their own home. An object moves. Something goes thump in the night. A door opens and closes.

Katie is scared, but Micah is curious and begins to film everything, including themselves while they sleep. Bit by bit, the camera begins to tell a story.

The film is actually a pretty slick example in the art of moviemaking and will no doubt earn Peli a much bigger budget next time around. Creaking doors, banging walls and flickering lights combine to create an ever-building sense of dread.

"Paranormal Activity" has its limits, however. It's interesting, and it's more effective than the average slasher movie, but it's not really all that scary. Nothing jolted me for at least the first 45 minutes, and even the final payoff isn't that great. It's just not as frightening as "Blair Witch" was the first time around.

It's solid moviemaking — that cost less than a Hyundai — and fairly creepy, but it's no classic, and it's not nearly worth the hype. But if the Halloween choice is between "Paranormal Activity" and "Saw VI," low budget is the way to go.

Rental Recommendation: Last year's "Quarantine" was scarier. Grade: B.

E-mail Steve Ouellette at: ouellette1918@gmail.com

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Steve Ouellette's Movie Reviews

Parade
Magazine
Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Entertainment Videos
Dwarfing Around With Ray Winstone VH1's 'Single Ladies' Launches Season 2 RPatz Swaps Cullen for Cronenberg Stars Crowd Red Carpet for AmfAR Knick's Anthony on NY Life, Linsanity, New Role Zefron Gets Eroticised Kristen Stewart 'On the Road' to Cannes Mads Mikkelsen on 'The Hunt' in Cannes Brad Pitt Dispels Wedding Date Rumors at Cannes Gerard Butler: the Good, the Bad and the Cannes ShowBiz Minute: Gibb, Billboard, Smith Robin Gibb of Bee Gees Dies at 62 Raw Video: Will Smith Slaps Journalist Wes Anderson Makes His Cannes Debut Tony Nominee Josh Young on Judas Role in 'JCS' Jaime King's Southern Belle Secrets ShowBiz Minute: Summer, Gaga, Beckham Fans Pay Tribute to Donna Summer Glenn Frey on New Solo Record, Eagles Disco Queen Donna Summer Dies at 63