Press-Republican

A&E

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
October 21, 2009

'Where the Wild Things Are' innovative, unique

By STEVE OUELLETTE, Movie Review

It's tough to be a kid.

No one knows this better than 9-year-old Max, the hero in Spike Jonze's boisterous adaptation of the beloved children's tale, "Where the Wild Things Are."

Maurice Sendak's slim 1963 book — nine sentences and 338 words — serves as a takeoff point for Max and his dreamlike story. Played by engaging newcomer Max Records, Max is a lonely child with a busy single mom (Catherine Keener) and an older sister who can't be bothered. Against the loneliness, he acts out in some clearly unacceptable ways, and when punished, he runs away "¦ across an ocean to a land of fantastic creatures.

The wild things — nine-foot puppets with computer-generated facial expressions — are both cuddly and dangerous, and they think Max would make a tasty snack. With a mixture of charm and empty threats, however, Max is quickly named king of the wild things and he goes about trying to make all their sadness go away.

This, however, isn't easy.

Max, dressed throughout in an increasingly ragtag wolf costume, is an interesting character. He thinks and feels deeply, but he can be short-tempered and impulsive. He has some depth — he's not merely a wild thing and not merely a stereotypical warm and lovable kid. He seems refreshingly real.

The wild things, with voices that include Forest Whitaker, Catherine O'Hara, Paul Dano and Chris Cooper, turn out to be a bickering and childlike family, with an array of human emotions, flaws and problems. The most troubled is the leader, Carol, voiced by James Gandolfini ("The Sopranos"), a big lovable lug full of barely suppressed anger and frustration who tends to destroy things.

The movie is innovative and unique — surprisingly so for a studio film. It's great fun when the monsters are destroying things, frolicking and having a grand old rumpus. It also tackles some fairly weighty issues, however, and there are some long, gloomy moments.

"Where the Wild Things Are" had what may be the best trailer of the year; it really made you want to see the film. The full-length version isn't quite as successful. It's a feast for the senses of small children (over perhaps the age of 5), but adults might find the lack of any discernible plot to be disorienting, and it drags at certain points.

Still, the film captures the spirit and the visual grandeur of the book. It might not qualify for classic status, but it's very good.

Rental Recommendation: Spike Jonze's absurd masterpiece remains "Being John Malkovich." Grade: A+.

E-mail Steve Ouellette at: ouellette1918@gmail.com


Text Only | Photo Reprints

Steve Ouellette's Movie Reviews

Parade
Magazine
Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Entertainment Videos
Whitney Houston's Church Mourns Her Passing Reaction to Houston's Death at Clive Davis Party Raw Video: Whitney Houston's Last Performance Fans 'Speechless' Over Houston's Death Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Latest Jason Wu Collection Shows Chinese Roots ShowBiz Minute: Madonna, Beresford-Redman, Pawsc Stars Show Support at AMFAR Charity Gala BCBG Kicks Off NY Fashion Week The Muppets Are Oscars Bound! ShowBiz Minute: House, Perry/Brand, Grammys Hearts Are Pumping for the Ladies in Red Androgynous Model Walks Runway As Man and Woman ShowBiz Minute: Super Bowl, Taylor, Adele Dench: 'I'm Not Going to Retire.' No 'Safe House' With Ryan Reynolds Around Stars Come Out at the Oscars Luncheon David Guetta, Avicii Talk Grammy Nominations Rapper J. Cole Is Ready for the Grammys Chris Brown, More R&B Performers Look to Rapping