Press-Republican

A&E

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
September 16, 2009

'9' not for age 9 and under

By STEVE OUELLETTE, Movie Review

It's far from the first post-apocalyptic movie to ever hit the big screen — not even of the animated variety — but "9" certainly adds something to the genre.

Not enough, though, to make up for a listless plot and a largely unsatisfying conclusion.

An expanded version of director Shane Acker's Oscar-winning 2004 11-minute short, "9" is padded out to 79 minutes with innovative visuals and plenty of battle scenes, but there's not enough substance to make it memorable.

Come to think of it, there's not a lot of actual substance to the movie's main characters either: Uniquely, they are a handful of burlap rag dolls somehow imbued with life, all that is apparently left of civilization after a takeover by vicious, destructive machines.

Our hero is #9 — each "stitchpunk" is identified only by the number on his or her back — who awakens in the midst of mayhem and a ruined world. Soon, however, he finds that there are others like him (eight others, to be precise), trying desperately to avoid a series of nightmarish contraptions bent on sucking the life out of them.

Elijah Wood ("Lord of the Rings") voices the neophyte #9, with some other familiar names around him. Jennifer Connelly is #7, a heroic female warrior; Crispin Glover is the eccentric #6; John C. Reilly is #5, a clever engineer; Martin Landau is #2, an aging inventor; Christopher Plummer is #1, the cautious and seemingly always wrong leader.

"9" is produced by Tim Burton, Acker's role model, but it doesn't have the depth or intrigue of Burton's stop-motion animation favorites such as "James and the Giant Peach," "The Nightmare Before Christmas" and "Corpse Bride." It's worth seeing, but maybe not until it gets to the small screen.

Though the frequent violence in the movie is of the cartoon variety — no oozing blood — "9" probably isn't a good idea for those, say, 9 and under. Some of the cleverly rendered evil machines have the potential to induce nightmares. Older kids will probably be OK and will get a kick out of the battles, but the story and the resolution might confuse them. It confuses me a little.

Rental Recommendation: Animated apocalypse was done so much better in "WALL-E." Grade: A.

E-mail Steve Ouellette at: ouellette1918@gmail.com

Text Only | Photo Reprints

Steve Ouellette's Movie Reviews

Parade
Magazine
Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Entertainment Videos
Whitney Houston's Church Mourns Her Passing Reaction to Houston's Death at Clive Davis Party Raw Video: Whitney Houston's Last Performance Fans 'Speechless' Over Houston's Death Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Latest Jason Wu Collection Shows Chinese Roots ShowBiz Minute: Madonna, Beresford-Redman, Pawsc Stars Show Support at AMFAR Charity Gala BCBG Kicks Off NY Fashion Week The Muppets Are Oscars Bound! ShowBiz Minute: House, Perry/Brand, Grammys Hearts Are Pumping for the Ladies in Red Androgynous Model Walks Runway As Man and Woman ShowBiz Minute: Super Bowl, Taylor, Adele Dench: 'I'm Not Going to Retire.' No 'Safe House' With Ryan Reynolds Around Stars Come Out at the Oscars Luncheon David Guetta, Avicii Talk Grammy Nominations Rapper J. Cole Is Ready for the Grammys Chris Brown, More R&B Performers Look to Rapping