Press-Republican

A&E

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
July 8, 2009

'Public Enemies' could have been better

By STEVE OUELLETTE, Movie Review

"Public Enemies" has all the trappings of greatness.

It's got two premier lead actors in Johnny Depp and Christian Bale, an Oscar-winning actress (Marion Cotillard), a strong director (Michael Mann) and an interesting topic — legendary crime figure John Dillinger — that provides the opportunity for endless gun battles, chases and escapes.

The lavishly filmed gangster flick, however, settles for pretty-goodness instead.

"Public Enemies" covers the latter stages of Dillinger's bank robbing career, starting with a crackerjack prison escape and continuing through his cat-and-mouse game with the FBI, his love affair with Cotillard's Billie Frechette and his famous final apprehension.

Depp is charismatic as Dillinger, the most-wanted criminal who developed a Robin Hood-like reputation (despite his tendency to use bystanders as human shields). He's calm, slick, calculating, and Depp is completely believable — but also cold and without much depth. Though the film tries not to mythologize Dillinger, we get very little insight into the character behind the steely glare.

Bale is Melvin Purvis, the righteous FBI agent in charge of Dillinger's capture. He's clean-cut, strong and determined, but the character is even more one-dimensional than Dillinger. It's almost a waste of Bale's talents.

French actress Cotillard ("La Vie en Rose") strikes a few sparks with Depp as his devoted girlfriend, a one-time coat-check girl, but their romance doesn't seem like a grand one worthy of ultimately risking Dillinger's life.

There are some excellent supporting performances thrown in, notably Billy Crudup as a young J. Edgar Hoover and Stephen Lang as a stone-faced Texas Ranger called in to help out the pencil-pushing FBI agents.

"Public Enemies" is eminently watchable — despite its 140-minute running time, it never drags. There's plenty of action going on, and visually, it looks perfect.

It's never fully engaging though. None of the characters feel fully formed, and there is no compelling storyline to carry it. It's good but could have been better.

Rental Recommendation: Can't vouch for the historical accuracy, but the pursuit of Al Capone in "The Untouchables" is more entertaining than the search for John Dillinger in "Public Enemies." Grade: A

E-mail Steve Ouellette at: ouellette1918@gmail.com


Text Only | Photo Reprints

Steve Ouellette's Movie Reviews

Parade
Magazine
Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Entertainment Videos
Whitney Houston's Church Mourns Her Passing Reaction to Houston's Death at Clive Davis Party Raw Video: Whitney Houston's Last Performance Fans 'Speechless' Over Houston's Death Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Latest Jason Wu Collection Shows Chinese Roots ShowBiz Minute: Madonna, Beresford-Redman, Pawsc Stars Show Support at AMFAR Charity Gala BCBG Kicks Off NY Fashion Week The Muppets Are Oscars Bound! ShowBiz Minute: House, Perry/Brand, Grammys Hearts Are Pumping for the Ladies in Red Androgynous Model Walks Runway As Man and Woman ShowBiz Minute: Super Bowl, Taylor, Adele Dench: 'I'm Not Going to Retire.' No 'Safe House' With Ryan Reynolds Around Stars Come Out at the Oscars Luncheon David Guetta, Avicii Talk Grammy Nominations Rapper J. Cole Is Ready for the Grammys Chris Brown, More R&B Performers Look to Rapping