Press-Republican

Editorial

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
September 9, 2010

EDITORIAL: Opportunity for revenue missed

Press-Republican

We're with Assemblyman Richard Brodsky (D-Westchester) in finding Gov. Paterson's veto of a bill to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812 "mystifying."

Paterson vetoed a bill last week to create a War of 1812 Bicentennial Commission. The commission would have promoted local celebrations all over the state to recognize the crucial part New York played in the winning of the War of 1812. (Some historians argue we broke even, but the British were unable to re-establish a foothold in the United States — their aggression was repelled, which was the hoped-for consequence of the war.)

Brodsky called the governor's choice not to sign the legislation "hurtful to taxpayers statewide, and especially upstate New Yorkers, who would have benefited economically from the increase in tourism this bill would provide."

Specifically, the bill aimed to provide $2.5 million for all of the functions the commission envisioned performing, and that, apparently, was the open wound for Paterson.

In Paterson's defense, he had tried all year to either come up with ways to save the state money — most of which the legislature rebuffed — or implored the legislators to divine their own proposals, which they, in effect, didn't do, either. Now, here comes a bill asking that he approve more spending.

The Press-Republican has refused to take sides against money-saving measures, believing state government's first priority had to be to find ways out of the disastrous economic slide New York has been forced to endure.

Nevertheless, in spite of the fact that this bill would involve the expenditure of more money, in contravention of our own firm position, we see the War of 1812 Commission not as an expense but as an investment. Communities that had a role in the war would have been given the resources to capitalize on an important moment in history and attract tourists to their areas to be informed and entertained. The $2.5 million would have been returned many times over.

Moreover, it would have helped many communities that are among the most needy — including the North Country. New Orleans and Baltimore claim pre-eminence among American contributors to the War of 1812, but the Battle of Plattsburgh was certainly at least as important in turning back the British. The land-and-lake battle here was pivotal to the British deciding against further incursions into the young United States.

The $2.5 million is a tiny amount when compared with the state budget, but so are many other requests by a myriad of organizations. Generally, we applaud the governor for keeping his eye on the target of affordability.

We argue in favor of the War of 1812 Bicentennial Commission, not because the expenditure would be so insignificant but because the revenue would have been so significant.

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Editorial