Press-Republican

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. In a change from our previous article comments system, before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t make political statements that more correctly belong in a signed Letter to the Editor.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
November 19, 2009

City votes to keep fluoride

PLATTSBURGH — City of Plattsburgh councilors voted in favor of keeping fluoride in the city’s drinking water.

Councilors Timothy Carpenter (D-Ward 1), George Rabideau (R-Ward 3), James Calnon (I-Ward 4) and Chris Jackson (D-Ward 6) voted against a measure to remove fluoride from the city’s water supply while Michael Kelly (D-Ward 2) and Amy Valentine (D-Ward 5) voted in favor of its removal Thursday night.

The vote came after about an hour’s worth of comments from the public and debate among the council.

Opponents of fluoride have argued for the better part of the past year that the chemical is dangerous and can lead to serious health issues.

They also argue against the systematic delivery of fluoride to the public through the drinking-water supply.

Supporters of fluoride say that it promotes healthy teeth and is not a health threat.

During the public comment period, five people spoke out against the use of fluoride in the city’s drinking water.

“The question is not whether the product or the dosage meets government standards; it’s whether the government standards, as they have been in the past, are based on too little research and on faulty assumptions,” Richard Robbins, husband of Valentine, said.

No one spoke in favor of fluoride.

Kelly said studies have shown that infants and people with heart or kidney disease, diabetes and vitamin C and magnesium deficiencies should not have fluoride.

“That means that about 25 percent of the people of this city should not have fluoride,” Kelly said to his fellow councilors.

“So, are you willing to vote to allow these individuals to suffer because of your decision?”

Rabideau said he was supporting fluoride because local, state and federal agencies have said that it is safe.

“I could start my own council tomorrow if I wanted to and say whatever I want,” he said in reference to numerous studies on the topic.

Calnon said opponents of fluoride should take their fight nationally to the Center for Disease Control and the Environmental Protection Agency.

“I find it interesting that the battle over fluoride is being done community by community, 19,000 people at a time,” he said.

Valentine said she agrees the fight should go nationally but worries that national standards have been diminished, an effect of the George Bush administration.

“Jim (Calnon) is right. We need to demand better standards including the removal of fluoride,” Valentine said.

“But I also think that we can do something locally like so many other communities have.”

Carpenter and Jackson both said they supported keeping fluoride based on recommendations from local and state health departments and federal agencies.

“If the Board of Health changes its mind tomorrow then I will change my vote,” Carpenter said.

Jackson said he, too, would go with government recommendations.

“I have no medical background so this is a tough one for me,” he said.

Following the meeting, Paula Calkins-Lacombe, director of the Clinton County Health Department, who attended the meeting with several other Health Department representatives, said that in her 30-plus years in the public health field in the community, she has seen no epidemic of fluoride-related illnesses.



E-mail Joe LoTemplio at:

jlotemplio@pressrepublican.com

Text Only | Photo Reprints
City votes to keep fluoride
by Anonymous , , Thu Nov 19, 2009, 08:17 PM EST
Local News

Photo of the Day
North Country Neighbors

Poll
AP Video