Lawmaker looks to push deadline

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.

comments powered by Disqus

November 7, 2009

By DENISE A. RAYMO The Press Republican Sat Nov 07, 2009, 10:28 PM EST

MALONE — One Franklin County lawmaker wants to rescind a 13-year-old local law that established Oct. 1 as the filing deadline for a tentative county budget.

Timothy Burpoe (D-Saranac Lake) said the artificial date leaves too many unanswered questions and not enough solid reimbursement and revenue numbers to formulate a wise spending package.

He did not formally ask that a new deadline be set, but he did tell legislators Thursday that an early- or mid-November date would give them better year-ending numbers to review and a clearer spending picture to work from as they budget for the coming year.

"We have to file a budget Oct. 1 without knowing what's happening in the fourth quarter and have to make an estimate," Burpoe said.

"We create this document and cut from there," he said. "People don't know what we're cutting, and there is a lack of communication to department heads.

"Hopefully, we can change the filing date for the tentative budget so it's within the fourth quarter," he said.

The change would be one way for legislators to avoid drastic slashes like the ones made in the last two weeks that chopped more than $1.5 million out of the tentative budget.

The work could be done slower and more deliberately to allow them to consider all factors before final recommendations are made and placed in the tentative spending package.

The local law, offered by current Legislator Raymond Susice (D-St. Regis Falls) and former legislators Andrew Barney of North Bangor and Mark Flack Wells of Fort Covington, was unanimously adopted May 16, 1996, by a Republican-majority-held legislature.

According to meeting minutes from that date, Wells said the four main goals of the Oct. 1 deadline would give legislators "adequate time to prepare the budget; give the public "more time to review the budget and make their feelings known; 'eliminate unforeseen problems' of data entry into the computer system; and show good faith that the Legislature 'is an open government and open for changes, improvement and progress.'"

During the same 1996 discussions, current Legislator Paul Maroun (R-Tupper Lake) said budget work begins in August and that 42 to 45 percent of the county budget comes from state and federal sources "and they are never on time.

"He didn't feel (moving the date) would give us a clear picture or that it was fair to the taxpayer because we are guessing," the minutes state.

E-mail Denise A. Raymo at: draymo@pressrepublican.com