Mohawks welcome tax-collection talks

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.

comments powered by Disqus

August 27, 2008

Anonymous The Press Republican Wed Aug 27, 2008, 12:00 AM EDT

AKWESASNE -- St. Regis Mohawks say Gov. David Paterson could cost the North Country $2 million a year if he taxes tobacco-products sales on American Indian reservations.

In a letter sent Friday, Chief James Ransom of the St. Regis Mohawk Tribal Council said the bill "like similar legislation proposed before it, will harm the northern New York economy not help it.

"The economic impact could be greater than $2 million per year," he said.

A survey conducted in 2003, commissioned by the Mohawk Anti-Tax Steering Committee, determined the anticipated economic impacts would reach into the millions if an increase in gasoline and tobacco-sales tax were collected on the Mohawk territory.

The Mohawks say they already collect $4 million in fees from the businesses that sell tobacco products and that those fees pay for badly needed services in the community, such as St. Regis Mohawk Police Department, health-care services, educational programs and services and programs for senior citizens.

Tax collection "will also result in a loss of jobs that no one in the state is even considering," said Chief Barbara Lazore.

Paterson said he would meet with tribal leadership across the state to talk about the planned tax collections, a step the Mohawks found encouraging.

Tribal Chief Monica Jacobs said, "the Tribe has always been open to having such a dialogue.

"We believe that building a positive relationship is the key to resolving many of the differences between the state and us."

The Tribal Council asked for a meeting with the governor to "have an open and frank discussion in regards to the state-tax concerns.

"It is only by building a positive relationship that state-tax concerns can be mutually addressed," said Ransom.