Courts may get involved in bridge debate

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.

comments powered by Disqus

June 26, 2009

By DENISE A. RAYMO The Press Republican Fri May 14, 2010, 08:09 PM EDT

AKWESASNE — Akwesasne leaders want the courts to decide if two Canadian officials illegally closed the Seaway International Bridge.

The Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, the governmental body on the Canadian side of the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation at Akwesasne, announced Friday it is pursuing action against Minister of Public Safety Peter VanLoan and Stephen Rigby, president of the Canada Border Services Agency.

The tribe wants Canadian court authorities to review VanLoan and Rigby's actions and determine the legality of closing the Cornwall customs house following protests from the Mohawks over the planned arming of agents there.

"The decision was obviously taken in haste and is illegal and severely detrimental to the interests of the Mohawks of Akwesasne and surrounding communities that rely on the bridge," the council stated in a news release.

The closure, which stretched into its 25th day Friday, "is also contrary to the mandate of the Canada Border Services Agency to facilitate the free flow of persons and goods through the port of entry."

Mohawks state that the lives of residents have been disrupted and "put at risk" because of these actions.

No traffic has been allowed to cross the international span since June 1 except for emergency vehicles.

Residents of Cornwall Island can travel to the city of Cornwall and back, but if they come to New York, they must stay. Businesses are losing money, people are using boats to cross the St. Lawrence River to get to work, and families are paying more for available goods.

Council members said some residents feel the closure "is a punitive and discriminatory" response to protests held at the customs house prior to the June 1 deadline.

The council wants a court decision, an order to reopen the bridge and to postpone arming agents until talks are held between themselves and Canada.

E-mail Denise A. Raymo at: draymo@pressrepublican.com