Press-Republican

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.
comments powered by Disqus
May 2, 2008

Schumer proposes tax on oil-company profits

By JOE LoTEMPLIO

PLATTSBURGH -- U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer is proposing a windfall-profits tax on oil companies.

North Country BizConnect
What's your opinion?
Discuss this story on the Economic Development forum of North Country BizConnect.


"Once again, consumers' pain is Exxon's gain," Schumer said in a statement.

"Oil companies are wracking up obscene profits left and right while American families are stretched to the limit by skyrocketing gas prices. It's high time for big oil to pay its fair share. It's time for a tax on their windfall profits."

Schumer's measure, co-sponsored by Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), would levy a tax on the windfall profits of American oil companies and foreign companies with substantial operations in the United States in 2008 and 2009.

The legislation provides a formula for calculating the earnings that are subject to the tax.

Oil companies would calculate their annual profit for each year from 2003 to 2007, subtract the year that saw the greatest profit and take an average of the four remaining years.

That figure, plus 10 percent, would represent the "reasonably inflated average profit."

Any profits earned by companies in 2008 or 2009 that exceed this "reasonably inflated average profit" will be deemed "windfall profit" and would be taxed at a special supplemental rate of 25 percent.

Schumer (D-Brooklyn) offered similar legislation in 2005 to fund relief for Hurricane Katrina victims.

He is also urging the Energy Department's independent watchdog to probe whether the decision of the administration of President George W. Bush to continue to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve amid record-high oil prices skirts the provisions of the 2005 Energy Act.

In addition to seeking a stop to filling the reserve, Schumer and other senators are threatening to block pending arms deals with oil-producing nations if those countries do not significantly increase their oil production.

jlotemplio@pressrepublican.com

Text Only | Photo Reprints
Local News

Recent Article Comments
Albany Round-up

Photo of the Day
Strange News
Videos: Editor Picks
Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Paul Suffers Narrow Loss to Romney in Maine Recording Superstar Whitney Houston Dead at 48 Maine GOP Chairman Says Romney Wins Caucuses Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion' 5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La. Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses Pentagon: Allow Women Closer to Front Lines