Local judge "discouraged" by official removal from bench

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.

comments powered by Disqus

March 19, 2008

Ellenburg's LaBombard 'discouraged"

By ANDREA VanVALKENBURG The Press Republican Wed Mar 19, 2008, 05:00 AM EDT

ELLENBURG -- After more than a decade of service, Ellenburg Town Justice Dennis LaBombard has been officially removed from office.

A few days after the New York State Court of Appeals upheld the Commission on Judicial Conduct's recommendation to have him removed from the bench, LaBombard said he is "discouraged and disappointed by all of this."

The commission recommended several months ago that the 12-year justice should be removed, but the decision was pending review by the Court of Appeals, which LaBombard requested shortly after the initial decision was rendered.

State officials handed down their ruling after, they said, the judge failed to submit the necessary paperwork that would further the review process.

But LaBombard, who was suspended with pay last month pending the review, said the paperwork was submitted but was rejected on a technicality.

He said he spent several long nights preparing the paperwork, only to have it returned because it wasn't bound properly and had to be resubmitted, which he thought his attorney was handling.

"How would I know what the proper way to bind this is? I got the paperwork sent, and all of this was all supposed to be taken care of. It's really a mess.

"I don't understand what they're trying to do me. I'm just fed up with the system. This is just overwhelming what the commission has done to me.

"I'm just exhausted -- totally, totally exhausted -- trying to fight to stay on this bench. I'm very upset and disgruntled about this."

The commission said LaBombard gave his step-grandchildren lenient sentences, tried to get another justice to go easy on a relative and asserted his judicial office after a minor car accident.

LaBombard said he treated his step-grandchildren "the same as anyone else.

"I personally don't feel that I did anything wrong. I am not going to bow my head and be ashamed."

He said the removal order is part a vendetta of to get him out of office.

"I know I have done nothing wrong. If I had, I wouldn't have fought this the way I have. I just can't deal with this anymore. It's damaging my health both mentally and physically. It's basically killing me.

"It's not fair to me for the amount of work I have given to this position and everything I have done for this town. I don't want to give up, but I have to. I just can't keep fighting this anymore."

He said he's had overwhelming support from the community since the recommendation was first issued in December.

As he continues to train the newly elected justice, Kenneth Prevo, who took office Jan. 1, he said he will likely resign to save the town from further turmoil.

LaBombard said he's spent the last few weeks in office "just trying to go forward with what I was elected to do.

"I have to stop this so everyone can move on. I could keep fighting this for another six months or a year, but I just can't do it anymore. This all is just totally, totally absurd. They can say that they removed me, but no, I'm going to resign."

avanvalkenburg@pressrepublican.com