Assembly Dems: NYers overpay for electricity

Local News

Discussion

PLEASE NOTE: There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

ALSO NOTE: Derisive name-calling of an individual or group will result in the entire comment being deleted. This includes the terms "stupid" and "idiot" and similar references.

Welcome to our new online comments feature. Before you can join the discussion, you must first register with Disqus and verify your email address.

Once you do, your comments will post after they have been reviewed by a moderator.

We welcome your thoughts and your opinions, including unpopular ones. We ask only that you keep the conversation civil and clean.

Not all comments are deemed printable. Some are disqualified, at the newspaper’s discretion, for a number of reasons. Here are some typical practices to avoid in trying to get your comment printed:

There is a 150 word maximum for comments. All comments greater than 150 words in length will be deleted in their entirety.

Don’t state as a fact something that is unsubstantiated or that our editors wouldn't know to be true.

Don’t presume someone’s guilt in a case when it hasn't been established by a court.

Don’t assail or impugn an identifiable individual or group. If you have that kind of criticism, sign your name and submit it as a Letter to the Editor. (There is some leeway on this in connection with public officials, but it is not unconditional.)

Don’t use profanity. This includes the term “tea bagger.”

Don’t be incendiary or tasteless. Those qualities are subjective, of course, and our editors will be the arbiters.

Do not identify yourself in the main content area of the article content form. Only by enforcing this rule can the moderators prevent unscrupulous commenters from falsely identifying themselves as someone they are not.

Don't type in all caps. It is considered the Internet equivalent of shouting.

In sports articles, do not criticize officiating.

Remember, moderators are not allowed to edit any article comments. If an article comment fails any of the above criteria, the entire comment will be deleted.

We monitor comments Monday - Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, 2 p.m. to 8 p.m. Approval of comments outside these times may be delayed.

comments powered by Disqus

March 4, 2009

By MICHAEL GORMLEY The Press Republican Fri May 14, 2010, 07:12 PM EDT

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Are New Yorkers paying 10 percent higher electric bills as victims of a legal scheme to boost electric company profits? Or is the state's complex price-setting system really creating an incentive for cleaner, low-cost power?

That's the fight set for a hearing Thursday, when Assembly Democrats will say New Yorkers overpay $2.2 billion a year for electricity. They say the system sets prices at the highest level and claim collusion is part of the process.

The head of an industry trade group, however, said the claims are wrong. Gavin Donohue of Independent Power Producers of New York says the system encourages cleaner generators of electricity such as wind or hydro power, which can profit from higher prices. Less efficient, greater polluting and older coal plants would profit less or not at all under the system, he said.

"What you have here is price fixing — secret, elegant price fixing," said Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, a Westchester Democrat whose committee is examining the system under decade-long de-regulation of the energy industry in New York. "Even if there wasn't collusion, the system is nutty ... it probably means that with a stroke of the pen, you could reduce everyone's bill by 10 percent."

Assembly Democrats have long opposed de-regulation of the industry begun under the Republican administration of Gov. George Pataki.

Donohue said New York's energy market is evolving and is already providing a trend of lower prices, when adjusted for inflation. He called the Assembly proposals to re-regulate or drastically change the system "unwarranted extreme measures," according a draft of his presentation at Thursday's hearing in Albany.

Donohue ackowledges higher prices for electricty are set under the current system, but said there is no collusion to profit from higher prices.

"It's totally inappropriate for an elected official to say that, given he has no evidence," said Donohue, who had worked in the Pataki administration. "We have a remarkably different story to tell."